# License architecture firm data to AI: who owns drawings > Looking to sell architecture firm data to AI? Licensing starts with the drawings. AIA's B101 keeps them with the architect and licenses the owner one project. By Matt Burns, Vaultfish. Canonical: https://vaultfish.com/answers/sell-architecture-firm-data-to-ai Published: 2026-10-16 Updated: 2026-10-16 ## The short answer Before an architecture firm licenses its data to AI, it checks two things. AIA's B101 form deems the architect the owner of its drawings and gives the client a license for one project. AIA Rule 3.401 bars members from disclosing what a client asked them to keep confidential. This page reports what the forms, the code and the statutes say. It is not legal advice. ## Who lists architecture firms? Not by name, on the pages I read. [Mercor's data page](https://www.mercor.com/data/) lists eight sectors and [micro1's page](https://www.micro1.ai/data-partnerships) lists six areas, and neither names architecture. [Polyshares](/buyers/polyshares)' [intake](https://polyshares.com/intake) lists AutoCAD among its design and CAD tools. I found no published price for architecture records. Polyshares' [case studies](https://polyshares.com/track-record) list a general contractor, the nearest field, and the [construction page](/answers/sell-construction-company-data-to-ai) covers it. All of it is self-reported. Mercor's [Benchmark Map](https://www.mercor.com/research/labor-index/benchmark-map/) (Oct 2026) puts architecture and engineering at 19 of 56 occupations covered by its 29 AI benchmarks. That measures how well AI is tested on the work, not what anyone pays for records of it. ## Who owns the drawings under AIA's B101? The architect does, on the standard form. AIA's contract help center [says](https://help.aiacontracts.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500009310881-The-Rights-of-an-Architect-s-Instruments-of-Service) that under B101-2017, the Owner-Architect Agreement, the architect and its consultants are deemed the authors and owners of their Instruments of Service. They keep their common law and statutory rights, including copyright. The client gets a license to use those documents "solely and exclusively for constructing, using, maintaining, altering and adding to the Project." That license ends only if the architect rightfully terminates for cause over the client's default. If the client terminates for convenience, B101 has it pay the architect a licensing fee to keep using them. My reading is that a firm on unedited B101 terms holds the copyright in its drawing sets, and the client's license reaches one building. Firms and clients often edit these forms, so read each signed agreement. ## What does copyright law add for buildings? [17 U.S.C. 102(a)(8)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102) lists architectural works among the works copyright protects. [Section 101](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101) defines one as the design of a building in any tangible medium, including a building, architectural plans or drawings. It covers the overall form and the arrangement of spaces and elements, but not individual standard features. [Section 120](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/120) limits that right in two ways. Anyone may photograph a built work that is visible from a public place, and a building's owner may alter or destroy it without the architect's consent. Ownership starts with the author, and an employer owns work made for hire ([17 U.S.C. 201](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/201)). A transfer needs a writing signed by the owner ([17 U.S.C. 204(a)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/204)). ## Can an architect disclose client information? AIA members face a written limit. Rule 3.401 of the [AIA Code of Ethics](https://www.aia.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/aia-code-of-ethics-april-2024.pdf) bars them from knowingly disclosing information that would adversely affect a client, or that a client asked them to keep confidential, except as the Code or law allows. Its commentary notes that the law does not recognize an architect-client privilege. In [Decision 2013-12](https://aia.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/2013-12%20Redacted%20NEC%20Case-Admonishment.pdf), AIA's National Ethics Council found a member broke Rule 3.401 by publishing photos of a client's home against the client's wishes. A dataset is a different use from a magazine spread, but it's the closest ruling I found. The same Code's Rule 5.302 treats designs, drawings and data as the firm's: a member who leaves needs the employer's permission to take them. State licensing boards set their own conduct rules, so ask counsel what yours says. ## What can an architecture firm list first? List CAD and BIM models, drawing sets, specifications, RFIs and submittals by project. Next to each, note the signed agreement and any client that asked for confidentiality. The [engineering page](/answers/sell-engineering-firm-data-to-ai) covers the consultants' licensing rules, and the [rights check](/rights-check) lists what to settle with counsel. Talk to a privacy or commercial lawyer in your state before you sign. micro1 may pay us a referral fee if a company we introduce goes ahead with it. [How we are paid](https://vaultfish.com/disclosure) Figure: comparison of Two rights in an architect's drawing set under B101: Copyright (emphasized: Deemed the owner, Architect keeps it), Project license (Client, one project). AIA's B101-2017 deems the architect the owner of its Instruments of Service and licenses the client to use them for the project. _Vaultfish helps you run the process. We are not lawyers and this is not legal advice. If you need counsel who knows this area, we can point you to one._ ## Sources - [Mercor's data page](https://www.mercor.com/data/) - [micro1's page](https://www.micro1.ai/data-partnerships) - [intake](https://polyshares.com/intake) - [case studies](https://polyshares.com/track-record) - [Benchmark Map](https://www.mercor.com/research/labor-index/benchmark-map/) - [says](https://help.aiacontracts.com/hc/en-us/articles/1500009310881-The-Rights-of-an-Architect-s-Instruments-of-Service) - [17 U.S.C. 102(a)(8)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/102) - [Section 101](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/101) - [Section 120](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/120) - [17 U.S.C. 201](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/201) - [17 U.S.C. 204(a)](https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/204) - [AIA Code of Ethics](https://www.aia.org/sites/default/files/2024-04/aia-code-of-ethics-april-2024.pdf) - [Decision 2013-12](https://aia.org/sites/default/files/2023-11/2013-12%20Redacted%20NEC%20Case-Admonishment.pdf)