What reps and warranties does an AI data buyer ask for

The short answer

An AI data buyer asks owners to promise five things: you own or can license the data, collected it lawfully, gave required notices and got consents, infringe nobody's rights, and disclosed known problems. SimpleClosure's terms have the owner indemnify the buyer. No buyer publishes its full contract.

Who carries the risk in SimpleClosure's termsOwnerWarrants andindemnifiesSimpleClosureLiability cappedBuyerTerms not publishedSimpleClosure's published terms put thewarranties and the indemnity on the owner.Who carries the risk inSimpleClosure's termsOwnerWarrants and indemnifiesSimpleClosureLiability cappedBuyerTerms not publishedSimpleClosure's publishedterms put the warranties andthe indemnity on the owner.

A rep is a statement of fact you make when you sign. A warranty is a promise that the statement is true, backed by money if it isn't. In a data deal the owner makes most of them.

What does SimpleClosure's list for owners say?

SimpleClosure's terms of service, are the only complete public list I found. An owner of digital assets warrants six things:

  • You are the lawful owner, or you hold all the rights, licenses, consents and authority to sell, transfer or license the assets.
  • The assets do not violate anyone's intellectual property, privacy or contractual rights.
  • You gave the notices and got the consents that privacy laws such as CCPA, CPRA and GDPR require.
  • The assets are free of liens and third-party claims.
  • Every open-source component is disclosed.
  • Known defects, claims and disputes are disclosed in advance.

What do other buyers say?

Troveo's licensing guide says the owner promises two things. The owner holds the rights it licenses. The owner acquired the data lawfully.

Handshake AI's data partnership page says partners remain responsible for making sure their transfer meets legal requirements (both undated).

The wording differs, but the shape matches. The buyer wants proof that you had the right to hand the records over.

What happens if a warranty turns out wrong?

SimpleClosure's terms make the owner defend SimpleClosure against claims that come from any of these:

  • a broken warranty
  • an infringement allegation
  • a privacy-law violation
  • a missing consent
  • an undisclosed open-source obligation

SimpleClosure caps its own liability at the greater of six months of amounts paid or $100.

Read that pairing carefully. The owner's exposure is wide. SimpleClosure's is capped. Replay's data privacy page says it caps your exposure at the fees paid. Most others have not published their terms, so ask for them before any call.

The same warranties come back in an acquisition. How a data license meets the acquirer's reps is in licensing data before an acquisition.

What can you gather before the first call?

Gather facts, not conclusions. Make a list of:

  • the systems that hold the records
  • the contracts with confidentiality clauses
  • the privacy notices your staff and customers received
  • any open-source code in a repository
  • any open dispute

The rights check walks through that list. The risks page covers what buyers publish about de-identification. The guide to licensing company data shows where warranties fit in the full process.

Who carries the loss if a buyer is breached is a separate question. It is answered in who is liable if the data buyer is hacked. What the buyer may do with the data, train on it or look it up per answer, is in training license vs RAG license.

Why a consent gap can cost a buyer its model is on our page on FTC model deletion orders. What to check when a deal is called insured is on our page on insuring a data deal.

Talk to a privacy or commercial lawyer in your state before you sign.

Vaultfish helps you run the process. We are not lawyers and this is not legal advice. If you need counsel who knows this area, we can point you to one. Ask for a referral