Is Polyshares legit? What the public record shows

The short answer

Polyshares names a company, Polyshares, Inc., and two managing partners. It licenses company data for a set scope and term, says you keep the data, and charges companies no fee. Its terms are public. We found no outside review, so check the points below first.

What is public about PolysharesIts own pagesTerms and data handlingOutside proofNone foundPolyshares publishes its terms, and we foundno outside review to check them against.What is public about PolysharesIts own pagesTerms and data handlingOutside proofNone foundPolyshares publishesits terms, and we foundno outside review tocheck them against.

Polyshares licenses company data to AI labs. Its homepage headline says "We buy your company's operational data", but its own pages say "A license is not a sale" and "You keep the business and the underlying data."

This page lists what is public about it, and what is not.

What is the bottom line?

Polyshares looks like a real, named company with public terms. We found no outside review, court record or named lab customer. Every claim below comes from Polyshares itself.

What does the evidence show?

ItemWhat the sources showSource
EntityPolyshares, Inc.polyshares.com
PeopleTwo managing partners are named: Nathan Mathews and Ryan Lockpolyshares.com
ModelLicenses Slack, email, CRM, ticket and file data for a defined scope and term, exclusive by default. You keep the data. Says it is the only counterparty, and buyers see de-identified listings in a buyer portalpolyshares.com, terms page, data handling
Fee to the ownerSays "No fee, no commission. We pay you." Paid per licensepolyshares.com
PaymentNet 30 to 60, once data is approved, shared and anonymizedTerms page
PrivacyIt says a specialist partner removes names, emails and phone numbers. Two Polyshares people can see an unmasked recordData handling
Buyers of the dataDoes not say which labs take which dataTerms page
Outside proofNo review, filing or customer named in what we readOur check

Where do its statements differ?

Ryan Lock wrote an X article. He says third-party firms do the de-identification, so Polyshares never touches raw files.

The data handling page says two people at Polyshares can see an unmasked record. They may describe different stages. Ask which one applies to you.

Its homepage says "No marketplace, no listing." Its data handling page says buyers see de-identified listings in a buyer portal, under a code instead of your name.

The article also says over 100 brokers work with Polyshares. The site names no broker program.

What should you ask before you share data?

  • Who sees unmasked records, and at what step?
  • Which buyers can see your listing in the buyer portal?
  • Who is the anonymization partner?
  • What does the license allow, and for how long?
  • Which labs can receive the data?

The same questions fit any buyer. See is micro1 legit for a comparison. For the risks, read is it safe to license company data to AI. The Polyshares directory record lists the fields side by side.

micro1 may pay us a referral fee if a company we introduce goes ahead with it. How we are paid

Have a lawyer read any contract before you sign. They like that.

Vaultfish helps you run the process. We are not lawyers and this is not legal advice. If you need counsel who knows this area, we can point you to one. Ask for a referral